Friday, January 27, 2012

Final Minutes of the 11/29/2011 Monthly DVLA Board Meeting



Final Minutes of the DVLA Board Meeting of November 29, 2011

The monthly DVLA Board Meeting was held at the Fire House.  Fourteen landowners were in attendance. 
Board Members attending:  Bill King, Mac Thomson, Terry Taylor, Jim Johnson, Julie Cropper
                                        
President Bill King called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

1.  Approval of the agenda:
     Under Old Business, Item a, a proposed feasibility study covering possible future demographics for Dammeron Valley will be discussed.  MOTION made by Jim Johnson and SECONDED by Julie Cropper that the agenda be approved, as amended.  Motion carried.
  
2.  Review and approval of the minutes of the October 25, 2011, monthly DVLA Board meeting:
     MOTION was made by Jim Johnson to approve the October 25, 2011, monthly DVLA Board meeting minutes.  SECONDED by Terry Taylor, and the motion carried. 

3.  Old Business:
     a.  Discussion on feasibility study for Dammeron Valley
           A short history of the consideration of a feasibility study for Dammeron Valley was presented by Brooks Pace.  The topic was first considered when Diamond Valley was investigating the possibility of incorporating and was setting their northern boundaries near the southern boundaries of Dammeron Valley.  A feasibility study regarding community costs is completed by the county and must be approved by the county commissioners.  It costs the Valley inhabitants nothing, is not a step towards incorporation, and simply attempts to determine future possibilities for growth in the Valley and costs of “as is” vs incorporation.  Mac Thomson MADE A MOTION that a feasibility study be requested by the Board from the county.  Jim Johnson SECONDED the motion, and a polling of the Board’s vote was recorded as follows:  Jim Johnson – Nay; Julie Cropper – Aye; Bill King – Aye; Terry Taylor – Aye; Mac Thomson – Aye.  The motion carried.
     b.  Update on attorney consultation – Bill King
            A working meeting was held by the Board members to discuss the report by the attorney regarding the concerns by the valley landowners of the operation of a commercial business in the valley and what, if anything, can be done about the situation.  A final opinion letter is being sent by the attorney outlining the many legal issues the Association could face if any action is taken.  The opinion letter will not be posted in order to preserve client/attorney confidentiality, and the minutes of the working meeting, which were recorded, will not be posted (upon the advice of the attorney) since the meeting was an emergency executive meeting that deals with a potential law suit solution.  This action is taken to avoid any missteps over legal boundaries.  Any legal action with the business in question would cost them nothing as they are represented by our tax dollars, but could cost the Dammeron Valley Landowners Association thousands of dollars.   
     c.  Update on the process of preserving the historical records of the association – Jan Yergensen
          The annual minutes, association documentation, and all receipts, including those for the park and fire house back to 1977, have been scanned onto CDs that fit into one small CD packet. 
A box of ballots needing to be saved and documentation that can be destroyed were turned over to the Board for disposition.  Copies of the CDs will be made for the Board and any of the members who desire copies.
          Many thanks to Jan Yergensen for completing this time-consuming job to preserve the records for the valley.
          Bill King recommended that the disc packet be kept in a small safe to be purchased by the association. 
    d.  Update on the test solar light to illuminate the Dammeron rock on Highway 18 – Terry Taylor
         New lights furnished by Bill King have been illuminating the Dammeron rock for approximately the past four weeks.  There is no illumination on the back of the rock or into the sky, and they are only on for four hours a night.  No negative responses have been received from landowners regarding the lights.  However, one landowner present does not want lights on the rock as she can see them from her windows.  Bill King asked if the test of the new lights could be continued until the next meeting in January to allow any additional feedback from landowners.  At that time, the lights will either be removed or the Association will purchase their own set of lights.

4.  New Business: (None Proposed)

5.  Reports:
      a.  President’s Message –  Bill King
          The open discussions in this year’s monthly board meetings have brought out a number of issues I had not thought about.  Hopefully, the questions raised and factual discussions surrounding concerns voiced by different landowners have helped to clear the air and dispel some of the rumors that seem to have been around for years.         
      b.  Fire Department Report:
          Due to a prior commitment, Chief Talbot was absent but submitted the following information:  During the previous month, there were no fires and two medical calls.  One medical call resulted from the vehicle fatality of a Veyo man at the entrance to Dammeron Valley.           
     c.  Financial/Secretarial Report – Carol Clason
         The web service provider for the Dammeron Valley Landowners’ Association deactivated our site indicating our legitimate activity had increased and was using far too many system resources than is allowed on shared hosting.  Our legitimate activity has not increased to any extent, according to Johnna Evans who oversees the web site, and she is recommending that the mydvla.org domain be moved to another service provider.  The service provider has reactivated the web site and bulletin board at this time.  The bulletin board will only be up long enough to extract the past minutes data and perform a clean uninstall of the software.  The web site will stay up for the time being as it does not seem to be causing a problem with the provider. 
         Regarding the Dammeron Valley Community Risk Plan, twenty copies were made into booklets and are being distributed to those who will use them.  The plan is also ready to be published on the Dammeron Valley bulletin board, but when I went to do so, the web site was down.  The plan will be on the site within a few days.
     I need to report that the printer I purchased when I first started to work for the association had a problem with a dark line printing down the middle of the every page.  After attempting to repair it with a new drum and cartridge, Bill King approved the purchase of a Cannon printer with which he was familiar.  It ended up costing us only $100 (which was less than it would be to repair the old one) as Staples had a $50 off sale plus they gave us $40 for turning in an old printer.  The new printer has the ability to scan documents into PDFs, and that is how we are able to submit an e-file copy to Johnna for the web site.
     There is nothing new or unusual on the financials.  One landowner last month wanted to know the payments of the lien costs which were collected from landowners delinquent on their dues.  During this fiscal year $210 have been paid for filing liens against delinquent landowners, and $160 have been collected from those landowners when they have brought their dues current.  I am requesting that this information not be listed on the budget sheet.  The landowner had thought that we listed the lien costs, so we needed to list the reimbursements.  We do not list the lien costs when the association pays the County to file a lien.  Line 6.7 entitled "Legal Fees" includes monies paid to attorneys only.  Line 6.8 was entitled "Title Service/Lien Fees", but was meant only to include those legal costs owed by the association.  The $37.00 listed on this line was monies paid to list the association on the new Homeowners' Association Registration List required by the State, and we have listed no lien filing costs against the landowners here.  I have retitled that line Title Service/Registration Fees to better identify the items.
          Jim Johnson MADE A MOTION that the additional monies owed to the attorney to cover the $3500 approved payment be paid to the firm, with the discussion on the remaining amount billed to be held at the January, 2012 meeting.  Terry Taylor SECONDED the motion, and the motion carried. 
      d.  Committee Updates:
           i.  Finance – Terry Taylor
               Comparison between the on-line bank statements and the financial statements submitted in tonight’s financial report indicate that all bank account balances match.  The only discrepancy is in the Dammeron Valley operating bank account where there were several written checks that had not been cashed by the bank.  When totaling these checks and adding them to the DVLA operating account, the account balance matched the bank statement.
           ii.  Public Safety – Mac Thomson:
                In exchange for burning tree stumps in the burn pile recently, a contractor hauled away all the debris from the pile.  This leaves the burn pile in good shape ending this year’s season.  It is possible the fatality occurred at the entrance of Dammeron Valley due to the driver attempting to avoid hitting a deer.  Now is the time to be watchful for deer, particularly from Winchester Hills all the way up to Dammeron Valley.               
           iii.Social – Jim Johnson
               There were three volunteers who responded to a request to help with an association Christmas party this year.  Information was given to them regarding monies available, past year’s volunteers, etc. but nothing further has been heard about the party.
           iv. Architectural Review – Bill King:
                There was a pre-built shed, a fence and a barn approved in the Meadows during the previous month.  
           v.  Public Properties – Julie Cropper:
                Nothing to report.
               
          Jim Johnson MADE A MOTION that the financial reports be accepted, and Terry Taylor SECONDED the motion.  The motion carried.
                       
6.  Comment and Discussion by Landowners:
     None given.        

7.  Adjournment:      
      Jim Johnson MADE A MOTION to adjourn the meeting which was SECONDED by Julie Cropper.  The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
    
Carol Clason
Recording Secretary   

Sunday, January 22, 2012

County Attorney presentation at next Board meeting - 6:00pm 1/31/2012

I want to let everyone know I have had a meeting with the County Attorney that will make the presentation at our next Board Meeting (6:00pm 1-31-2012), Eric Clark. He advised he and Mr. Kim Hafen will be out to share information on the following topics related to the incorporation process:

1. Tax issues, what services will or will not be covered by existing taxes.

2. Procedure for requesting a feasibility study, qualifications that must be met before a study will be considered by the County.

3. What the Feasibility Study will reveal.

4. Requirements for a petition to incorporate

5. Election process to approve or deny by the citizens.

The presentation will take 30-40 minutes and we'll have just over an hour for Q&A by those attending.

I would also encourage those who plan to attend to come with an open mind on the subject and listen to the presentation respectfully, and during the following Q&A time to allow it to be used by those who actually have questions and not use it for presenting views one way or the other. We can have a discussion meeting schedule at a later time to openly discuss any part of the process, but let's try to use this time to our advantage while we have the resources of the County present who actually have worked with other communities in this area. If you don't want to listen to the information presented, please don't attend and take away from those who do.

I have already had and responded to several emails on the topic, offered to meet in person and discuss the concerns raised, but have not been taken up on my offer. I find email a very impersonal method of corresponding, and when I see someone who has genuine concerns I am convinced the better method of communication is a sit-down meeting where we can look one another in the eye and have real, open discussions. Of the emails I have had, it is plain to see there are some misconceptions about the incorporation process and the pros and cons of being an incorporated area. I am not at this time in favor of incorporating, but I want to get more information and find out if there may be some benefits to the community that I am not aware of. I don't think passing up something that could be a benefit to everyone because I 'feel' one way or the other is fulfilling my responsibilities to the community I live in, I want to know all of the ins and outs to make sure my 'feelings' are justified, and if they are not I am not going to pass up an opportunity to gain benefits if they are available.

So we're not starting a petition, not starting down the road to the Feasibility Study, we are only gathering information on which we can collectively see if where we're at is the most beneficial place to be. There will not be any voting or decision making on the subject taking place at the meeting, this is information only.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation and interest,

Bill King, President - DVLA